Wednesday, September 22, 2010

The Future and a New Era



It isn't a secret that both major parties are promoting extreme budget cuts across America and attack the rights of public employees. States nationwide face extreme budget deficits. There are billions of dollars in budget deficit issues. Both Republicans and Democrats propose solutions to the budget crises. They feel that public workers and those who depend on their services will pay for the crisis. Jerry Brown is running for Governor for California. He claims to be for labor and unions. Yet, Brown recently bragged about his anti-union credentials. The San Francisco Chronicle reported that: "...Jerry Brown said Friday that if elected governor he would have to "do things that labor doesn't like," including cutting pension benefits for public employees and asking labor leaders to "put everything on the table" to get California's bloated budget under control.” Brown said that he voted against pay raises for the state employees not once, but twice. These are his credentials for handling the budget crisis. His Republican opponent is a billionaire who is more honest with his anti-public worker comments. There is the same dynamic in Oregon. Both parties want to target public workers. John Kitzhaber is a Democrat and he's union backed. He is debated his Republican opponent on who can mostly take from public employees. He wants cost saving negiotations or possibly cutting wages and benefits next year. The current NY Democratic Governor David Paterson has attacked viciously public employees. He promised that the incoming Governor, regardless of political party will resume the attack. The current Democratic Governor have made huge cuts in education and social services in Illinois because of the budget criss. He made huge cuts in education and social services, while adding a sales tax that disproportionally effects working-class people. These events aren't made by coincidence. They are real. This is apart of an agenda by Republicans and Democrats in order to use coded language to cut benefits under the guise of confronting state budget deficits. Education and social services are defunded now. The Governor of Indiana Mitch Daniels want racial cuts in state government, while doing nothing to allow Wall Street to be held accountable. They hate public workers, but love public greed. They wnat to reduce wages and benefits of public employees, but want money to enrich the military industrial complex. Mitch used brute force instead of negoitations in Indiana to harm the power of unions. These are corporate ideals. Unions are being attacked, so that wages and benefits for all working people can be lowered. This is how corporations plan to survive the recession and maintain the highest profitability possible. The good news is that the labor movement is fighting back. They are working with communities to defend their rights. Some want the taxing of the rich and other pro-working solutions including mass demonstrations in order to have solutions. Others desire an infrastructure policies and investments in research to build up America. Some Democrats are following in the lead of anti-union forces by acting pro-labor. Then, when they get into Congress they betray them by calling for more radical budget cuts. So, cutting jobs and living standards are evil and should be fought against. If you try to immediately balance the budget now, it's almost impossible since there is little revenue and capital investment now. Balancing the budget should be a long term solution.





The Tea Party won numerous primary elections. This is a new paradigm in our society. These victories for the Tea Party movement occured, because there are a huge social and economic crisis in the USA. Republicans Christine O'Donnell of Delaware and Carl Paladino of New York state won their primaries. This angered the GOP establishment since they desired more moderate candidates to exist in the election year of 2010. There is general disgust of the current politcal system. Yet, becareful of what you wish for since you might just get it. A lot of people want the Tea Party to win election, but if they win, this country could radically change as well. In Alaska, Joe Miller won his primary over the incumbent Senator Lisa Murkowski. Voter turnout in primary races are usually low. There are 2 factions of the Tea party. One faction is generally made up of grassroots people that have legitimate concerns as it relates to governmental policies. The other faction is made up of pretty much corporate sponsors in order to promote a slick form of neo-conservativism (billionaire reactionaries fund this faction like FOX News owner and Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch including the oil baron Koch brothers of Kansas). This corporate faction of the Tea Party is trying to promote Republican values when the nation is gradually moving more progressive on issues of human rights. President Barack Obama have left a political vacuum since some of his programs have left the nation stagnant or not seeing a massive improvement. Obama says that it will take time to see improvement from the wreckless policies from the previous 8 years of the Bush administration. The corporate Tea Party mix legitimate criticism over Wall Street bailouts to promote militarism and scapegoating immigrants plus other Americans. Their solutions that they propose aren't new nor cutting edge. It's pretty much the non-populist agenda of huge cuts and even getting rid of social porgram, attacks on public sector workers, and other more extreme policies that President Barack Obama can ever dream off. O'Donnell from Delaware (she defeated the former governor and current congressman Michael Castle) wants to repeal Obama's health care law. The law isn't perfect, but it has some legitimate parts in it. Paladino wants cuts in Medicaid by 20 percent (when it's for the poor and disabled) and wants sharper attacks on public employee unions. So, both major parties are funded by Big Business. Independent solutions are needed to solve our problems not the extremes of austerity or war mongering.




Two British Pro-Life protesters have been arrested outside the local BPAS abortion business. They have been arrested twice recently by the police in Brighton. They await the decision of the Crown Prosecution Service to figure if they will face a Criminal Prosecution. Andy Stephenson is 35. He's the married father of 2. Katherine Sloane is 19 and both people are pro-life campaigners. They stood outside the BPAS clinic in Brighton on July 27th. They raised a banner hsowing an early aborted baby near the entrance of the clinic and stood in silent protest. They have been there for about 45 minutes. Then, they were approached by the police. The police told them to take down their pictures or they would be arrested. A discussion followed as Mr. Stephenson tried to explain why their actions were laws. Stephenson and Miss Sloane refused to take down the banner. they believe that they had a lawful right to protest and educate. The police therefore arrested them. They took them to the Brighton Police station where they were photographed, taken of their fingerpints, and DNA were taken from them. They were offered a fixed penalty notice instead of being prosecuted. They refused the police's offer and requested a court hearing. They were threaten with arrest again. Yet, Mr. Stephenson and Miss Sloane returned to the abortion in August 20th, 2010. They protested in the same manner. They stood in silent protest for 45 minutes and they were again approached by police. Stephenson and Miss Sloane refused to take down the banner and so were again arrested and taken to Brighton Police Station and held for 14 hours. This time they were interviewed under caution and were supported by the Christian Legal Centre which has instructed human rights barrister Paul Diamond in the case. They have now been placed on police bail and will return on the 13th of October to hear whether the Crown Prosecution Service have authorised charge for prosecution under the Public Order Act. Andy Stephenson says “all we were seeking to do was to highlight the dangers of abortion to the users of the BPAS clinic. The women who go to these clinics are simply not told the full story as to what abortion involves and the damage that it causes women. We always stand in complete silence and let the pictures do the talking.” Andrea Williams, director of the Christian Legal Centre, which is supporting the case, said: "This is a test case for their democratic right to reveal what abortion really is like. This case raises important questions about whether our society will allow robust and rigorous debate about what remains a highly controversial issue." "In the 21st century it is not appropriate to silence and to censor those who speak out against abortion, even if the manner in which they do so is not how many would choose," Williams continued. She concluded: "Many people in the UK remain horrified at the nature and scale of abortion in this country. There have been 7 million abortions in England and Wales since abortion was legalised in 1967. Obviously there are a range of ways in which people will choose to engage in this important debate depending on what they judge to be the most effective in each situation. However, the freedom to engage and provoke public debate on this matter of life and death must be safeguarded." This issue is commonplace. People have the right to peacefully display dissent even if the people doing it are Pro-Life.







Radical privitization is a threat even in a time of recession. The so-called Pastor Terry Jones was recent sent a security bill of $180,000 by local authorities for his burn the Koran uproar. Jones is a religious puppet using hatred and division. He rejects religious freedom, love, and people. Under the First Amendment, he still has the right to protest and burn whatever book he wishes on private property (under exceptions like arson, etc.). his stunt was divisive. It was done to stir up trouble. The police charging a citizen for securing an event is even excessive and mind boggling. Some people are angry over Jones' prejudice and hate. Some people feel that the public shouldn't pay for him. The Balloon Boy's father was charged restitution for the turmoil that he cuased. Both events are fabricated non-events that the media hyped up. Some believe that the public seek compensation since it is more appropriate to target the mainstream medisa' advertising sales during their 24 hour media glorification of non-events. Private citizens being charged is a growing trend among public police forces to cover their budget shortfalls. The police in Anchorage, Alaska have begun sending bills to people if officers have to make more than 8 trips per year to their homes. In the UK, the police sent a man a bill when their car was damaged pursuing the victim's stolen vehicle. These extreme cases are real, but they threaten to turn the police into a private security force. Private security forces are rising since police plus sheriff departments face more cutbacks. They are telling citizens and criminals even what types of crimes they'll respond to. The Macleans reported in the article Third World America about something. They wrote aobut in February about how the the board of commissioners of Ohio’s Ashtabula County faced a scene familiar to local governments across America: a budget shortfall. Cutting spending and the sheriff's budget came in that location by 20 percent. The agency staff wen from 119 a few years ago to 70. They have no patrol units. People are getting their property stolen, their houses broken into, and no one is investigating these crimes. The report for the insurance companies are going up. The government forcing cutbacks are making charging victims for their security services a reality. More cutbacks are going on. Some predict that imf riots will take place in America if the economic collapse continues. Big corporations like Monsanto and Disney can afrord to have private mercenaries like Blackwater to act. Blackwater is now Xe. Xe has fully equipped for high level espionage with a full blown private air force and even tactical weapons. Corporate government thuggery can exist with these mercenaries as have been documents (beyond local public services). Security might go into the highest bitter if thing don't improve. There is the surveilleance top secret industrial complex. Privatization has boon the security and intelligence gathering sicne the war on terror. Now, it's been found that an Israeli organization was in charge of tracking, tracing, and databasing peaceful American activists (on behalf of the oil and gas industry in Pennsylvania). It's already obvious that property taxes are no longer sufficient to pay the security bills. Local warlords shouldn't control us. Local mafia gangs shouldn't collect protection money from businesses, churches, and citizens. Perhaps it is time we listen to Ohio Judge Alfred Mackey who, after deep cuts to the local sheriff’s department, advised citizens to carry guns for protection.





Information about the Jesuits and the Vatican are coming out all of the time. There are Jesuit trained leaders like Jack Welch (with links to GE) and Knight of Malta Geoffrey T. Boisi. They are in the business world and are high level ROman Catholics. Boisis is apart of the Trilateral Comission, has ties to the Papal Foundation, he's business operation mastermind, and he's in league with the Fordham Jesuits. Boisi is a kingpin in the corporate world then. It was Welch and Boisi using GE who initiated job outsourcing via GECIS. Jack Welch is a avid Catholic and was advised by Jesuits during his tenure at GE, at one time apparently intending to make a Jesuit his speech writer. Boisi invested heavily into Genpact when he was at JP Morgan using their investment trust funds. Parag Khanna is another globalists that went into the World Economic forum since he said that: "...THE CFR WASN'T GOBAL ENOUGH FOR ME SO I WENT TO THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM..." He wanted a global division of labor to work to common global goals. He was Jesuit trained in Georgetown, he a CFR member, and a United States Special Operations Forces as a geopolitical advisor, and had ties to the United Nations Foundation. His father worked for Tata Outsourcing. Khanna was propped up by Jesuit people like Robert Galluci and John DeGioia. He was taught Kant and Hegel by the Jeusits in their philosophy sources. So, it's clear that the Jesuits influencing outsourcing corporations desire globalization and a new world order system.





By Timothy


No comments: